Summary:
Julian Gough compares capitalism and modern economics to religion. The advance of science has removed the divine mystery from much of life, but in the past 30 years, the advance of free market capitalism has put it back. Only modern economics can now provide forces that we don’t understand. Modern high finance, like the Latin of the Christian Church, has profound mysteries at its core. Not even bankers know what a collateralised debt obligation cubed really is. The abandonment of the gold standard in 1971 was the crucifixion and resurrection of capitalism; the traumatic and liberating event which allowed capitalism to be purely religious and entirely driven by faith. As with all religions, once its link to the physical world was severed, free market capitalism mourned briefly, then experienced a surge of energy and expansion. From "fiat lux" to “fiat money.” But as with all religious expansions, success bred hubristic dementia. The elevation of metaphysical above physical turned into a kind of contempt for the physical. (Published: July 2008)
Sunday, August 31, 2008
The sacred mystery of capital - Prospect Magazine
Friday, June 6, 2008
Nassim Nicholas Taleb: the prophet of boom and doom - The Times
Summary:
Interview with Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of "The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable." Problem with probability theory: Fat Tony vs. Dr. John. On buying "out-of-the-money" options: when markets rise, they rise by small amounts, when they fall, they fall dramatically. Mediocristan vs. Extremistan. On banks and failing of Long Term Capital Management. Importance of religion and being ecologically conservative. Investment strategy: 90% in safest government securities, 10% high risk. (Published: 01/06/08)
Notes:
all were black swans
Saturday, April 19, 2008
I and My Brother Against My Cousin - The Weekly Standard
Summary:
Stanley Kurtz reviewing Philip Carl Salzman's "Culture and Conflict in the Middle East". Dominant theme of cultural life in Arab Middle East is the template of tribal life: collective responsibility, feuding, balanced power and honor shaping every action and thought; Islam and state merely superficial layers. Controlled anarchy. Tribal societies egalitarian and democratic. Islam: uniting all Arab tribes in ultimate feud against infidel outsiders. Western strategy for change should focus on tribal aspect not Islam; Islam sacred, tribal aspects not so and open for criticsim (14/04/2008)
Notes:
- Middle Eastern tribes: think of themselves as giant lineages, traced through the male line, from some eponymous ancestor
- each giant lineage divides into tribal segments, subdivide into clans, divide into sub-clans, etc down to families
- traditionally Middle Eastern tribes have existed outside of the police powers of the state
- keep order through a complex balance of power between these fusing and segmenting ancestral groups
- central institution of segmentary tribes is the feud
- security depends on willingness of every adult male in given tribal segment to take up arms in its defence; universal male militarization
- attack on lineage-mate must be avenged by entire group; vice versa, any lineage member is liable to be attacked in revenge for offense committed by relative
- results in system of collective responsibility: action of any one person directly affect reputation and safety of entire group; collective guilt
- Muslim tribal society is both fundamentally collectivist and profoundly individualist
- no man of the tribe can, by right, command another
- all males equal, free to dispose of their persons and property and to speak in councils that determine fate of the group
- fundamentally democratic
- Arab saying: "I against my brother; I and my brother against my cousin; I and my brother and my cousin against the world"
- liberal Westerners: why risk battle without first making a reasonable effort to talk problem out?
- sort of question liable to be posed by someone living where a state monopolizes the legitimate use of force and police and courts can be relied upon to keep the peace
- in non-state setting, where anarchy is kept under control only by the threat or use of force, it makes sense to send a war party first and ask questions later
- conveying impression of weakness
- preventing future abuse in lawless desert environment by publicly making capacity known to swiftly unify to preserve interests
- Arab tribesmen preoccupied with maintaining deterrence and are prepared to use force preemptively
- much like neocons: hawkish conservatives ("rightly") believe global anarchy underlies reality of international system; much like de facto stateless anarchy in which Bedouin Arabs live
- swift and seemingly disproportionate resort to retaliatory force against apparently trivial offenses is an effective technique for surpressing future challenges
- eg careful use of targeted force against Western critics of Islamism; overtly religious action actually shaped by a hidden tribal template
- eg fatwa against Salman Rushdie, rage against Muhammed cartoons, killing of Theo van Gogh, ...
- all examples of pro-active deterrence
- doves: use of force serves to unite foe; creating impression of an infidel war against Muslims, thus recruiting every Muslim lineage into bin Laden's civilisational war party
- true, but on the other hand, failure to strike back creates impression of weakness that invites further attacks
- Islamists view cooing of the doves as sign that their feud against the West has successfully weakened and split our own coalition
- disturbing lesson: in the absence of fundamental cultural change, the feud between the Muslim world and the West is unlikely ever to come to an end
- tribal feuds simmer on and off for generations, with negotiated settlements effecting only temporary respites
- Western liberal template takes an experience of peace under the lawful authority of a state as the normal human condition
- in this view, when peaceful equilibrium is disturbed, reasonable men reason together to restore normalcy
- in tribal template, low-level endemic feuding in conditions of controlled anarchy is the norm
- liberal "come let us reason together" model has little currency in Arab tribal culture
- Salzman: Tribal template is dominant pattern of Arab culture, not religion
- religion is overlay in partial tension with, and deeply stamped by, the dynamics of tribal life
- To think of Middle East as consisting of a number of states is mistake.
- Rather, collection of tribes.
- Governing party essentially tribe or tribal coalition with most power (e.g. Saddam Hussein)
- Statelessness increases as one moves towards periphery of nation.
- Statelessness seen by tribes as essential condition of dignity, equality, and freedom.
- State = predation under official guise
- Importance of avoiding dishonourable submission; avoiding life of peasant humiliation and exploitation
- Salzman: tribal template dominant pattern of Arab culture
- not details of tribal kinship matter, but underlying principles of "balanced opposition," in which collective responsibility, honor and feuding shape every action and thought;
- quick shifts in loyalty often called for
- unite with erstwhile enemies in opposition to a more distant foe
- all members of an enemy group are potential targets
- demand honourable behaviour from members of own group
- maintain own and group's honour by a clear willingness to sacrifice for the collective good
- Islam's founding triumph was to raise stakes of balanced opposition by uniting all the Arab tribes in an ultimate feud against infidel outsiders
- Muslim's treating tribal era of Muhammed and his early successors as golden age of Islam
- cultural influence of tribal template thus remains pervasive
- Gaza's feuding clans: revelation of bedrock of Middle Eastern social organisation
- ever-present and ever-influential beneath superficial layers of Islam and state
- political paradox posed by Salzman's tribal interpretation of Arab culture
- on one hand, pervasive tribal principles of balanced opposition are "precluding democracy" in Middle East
- to democratise Middle East, the particularist loyalties at the core of balanced opposition (kin, tribe, sect) need to be replaced by greater "individualisation"
- only then could an authentic liberal democracy based on constitionalism and the rule of law take root in the Arab world
- on other hand, tribal culture is largely egalitarian, individualist and democratic in character
- balanced opposition is democratic because decision making is collective and everyone has a say
- absence of government authority, combined with system of shifting coalitions of willing individuals, means that freedom, equality and personal responsibility - along with bellicosity and courage - are fundamental tribal values
- confusion about meaning of words "freedom," "equality," and "democracy"
- in liberal state, freedom is rights-based and universal
- in tribal society, freedom is freedom of freestanding warrior and his tribe to dominate and deprive others of their liberty
- equality refers to equal combat, as opposed to submission
- democracy is closer to a conclave of family heads in the Godfather, never far from potential violence, than to debate in a modern representative assembly
- not equality before the law, but equality outside of the law
- democracy requires something more fundamental than open consultation between descriptively free and equal parties
- Arabs know all about freely expressing their opinions in open council, yet have fundamental reservations about entering into the sort of social contract required to create a modern liberal state
- largely justified: state offers only thin alternative to "the war against all"
- most Middle Eastern states are just reincarnations of the predatory winner-take-all tribal coalitions of old
- why exchange protection of your family, tribe or sect for submission to a weak or predatory state?
- "tribal society contains just enough order to make a bit of violent anarchy bearable, and just enough grasping anarchy to make a liberal social contract unreliable"
- won't be easy to weaken cycle of particularism, ie the self-reinforcing loyalties of extended family, tribe and sect that dominate Arab countries at both state and local levels
- West needs to learn to understand and critique the Islamic Near East through a tribal lens
- Islam is only half the cultural battle
- tribal practices, however, are less swathed in sacredness than explicitly Koranic symbols and commandments
- therefore more susceptible to criticism and debate
- new and smarter strategy for change